Passer Rating vs EPA: Which Tells You More?
Why we rank quarterbacks by EPA per dropback, and what passer rating still gets right.
Read Article →| Season | Quarterbacks (starts) | Top receivers (targets) | Pass Yds | TD-INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Caden Veltkamp (4), Easton Messer (1) | Kelby Valsin 47, Easton Messer 44, Dominique Henry 34 | 1,518 | 12-2 |
| 2025 | Caden Veltkamp (12) | Easton Messer 118, Asaad Waseem 86, Jayshon Platt 75 | 3,927 | 25-21 |
| 2024 | Cam Fancher (8), Tyriq Starks (2), Kasen Weisman (1), Carson Cruver (1) | Omari Hayes 41, CJ Campbell Jr. 40, Marlyn Johnson 20 | 2,504 | 14-11 |
| 2023 | Daniel Richardson (8), Casey Thompson (3) | LaJohntay Wester 141, Tony Johnson 47, Je'Quan Burton 42 | 2,635 | 19-13 |
| 2022 | N'Kosi Perry (10) | LaJohntay Wester 55, Je'Quan Burton 33, Jahmal Edrine 30 | 2,572 | 25-4 |
| 2021 | N'Kosi Perry (12) | LaJohntay Wester 82, Brandon Robinson 51, Je'Quan Burton 35 | 3,082 | 20-8 |
| 2020 | Nick Tronti (4), Javion Posey (3) | T.J. Chase 36, Jordan Merrell 16, Willie Wright 15 | 1,043 | 6-5 |
| 2019 | Chris Robison (13) | Harrison Bryant 97, Deangelo Antoine 84, John Mitchell 61 | 3,582 | 27-8 |
| 2018 | Chris Robison (10), Rafe Peavey (1) | Jovon Durante 89, Willie Wright 62, Harrison Bryant 57 | 2,389 | 11-15 |
| 2017 | Jason Driskel (10), Daniel Parr (3) | Willie Wright 74, Kamrin Solomon 40, Harrison Bryant 39 | 2,720 | 19-7 |
| 2016 | Jason Driskel (10), Daniel Parr (1) | Kalib Woods 91, Henry Bussey III 38, Nate Terry 30 | 2,415 | 9-12 |
| 2015 | Jaquez Johnson (10), Jason Driskel (2) | Jenson Stoshak 93, Kalib Woods 64, Henry Bussey III 40 | 2,564 | 12-14 |
| 2014 | Jaquez Johnson (8), Greg Hankerson (1) | Lucky Whitehead 78, Jenson Stoshak 40, Alex Deleon 28 | 1,790 | 12-1 |
| 2013 | Jaquez Johnson (9), Greg Hankerson (2), Daniel McKinney (1) | William Dukes 69, Daniel McKinney 57, Jenson Stoshak 38 | 2,348 | 16-10 |
| 2012 | Graham Wilbert (11), Stephen Curtis (1) | William Dukes 92, Daniel McKinney 66, Nexon Dorvilus 43 | 2,845 | 18-6 |
| 2011 | Graham Wilbert (11), David Kooi (1) | DeAndre Richardson 66, Darian Williams 46, Nexon Dorvilus 35 | 1,800 | 8-15 |
College starts are inferred: the team's first passer in each game.
| Player | Pos | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelby Valsin | WR | 47 | 40 | 512 | 5 |
| Easton Messer | WR | 44 | 30 | 438 | 3 |
| Dominique Henry | WR | 34 | 25 | 267 | 3 |
| AJ Johnson | TE | 10 | 8 | 43 | 1 |
| Branden Hoch | WR | 10 | 6 | 60 | 0 |
| RJ Garcia II | WR | 8 | 4 | 37 | 0 |
| Ethan Ervin | RB | 5 | 5 | 23 | 0 |
| Damon Allen | WR | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Tucker Holloway | WR | 4 | 4 | 65 | 0 |
| Kaden Shields-Dutton | RB | 4 | 3 | 22 | 0 |
| Antojuan Woody | WR | 4 | 3 | 14 | 0 |
| Leonard Farrow | RB | 3 | 3 | 23 | 0 |
| Week | Opponent | Result | Quarterback | Cmp-Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | at FLA | L 21-66 | Caden Veltkamp | 34-53 | 276 | 1 | 2 |
| Week 2 | vs NAVY | W 38-30 | Caden Veltkamp | 27-33 | 393 | 5 | 0 |
| Week 3 | vs FIU | W 16-10 | Caden Veltkamp | 24-36 | 202 | 0 | 0 |
| Week 4 | at ULM | W 45-17 | Caden Veltkamp | 31-42 | 333 | 2 | 0 |
| Week 5 | vs texas southern | W 66-10 | Caden Veltkamp | 18-29 | 314 | 4 | 0 |
| QB → Receiver | Tgt | Cmp | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caden Veltkamp → Kelby Valsin | 47 | 37 | 483 | 3 |
| Caden Veltkamp → Easton Messer | 43 | 30 | 438 | 3 |
| Caden Veltkamp → Dominique Henry | 33 | 23 | 249 | 2 |
| Caden Veltkamp → AJ Johnson | 10 | 7 | 38 | 0 |
| Caden Veltkamp → Branden Hoch | 6 | 5 | 44 | 0 |
| Caden Veltkamp → Damon Allen | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Caden Veltkamp → Ethan Ervin | 5 | 5 | 23 | 0 |
What the box score cannot tell you about the people behind the pass.
Why we rank quarterbacks by EPA per dropback, and what passer rating still gets right.
Read Article →Completion percentage over expected gives credit for difficult completions. Here is how ACE measures it.
Read Article →A sack is the rush, the line and the decision. Why our dropback stats count them.
Read Article →Learn the break down of ten mind-body recovery tools, each backed by science, including how and when to use them to perform at your peak.